User talk:Bcca15
hi brad
|
Metallica v. Napster, Inc.
[edit]The Members include James Silvers, Brad Abel, and Eric Cook.
On April 13, 2000 Metallica filed a lawsuit against the file sharing company Napster. The attorney representing Metallica was Howard King and the judge ruling over the case was Federal Judge Marilyn Hall Patel. On July 11, 2000 Lars Ulrich, who acted as the lead spokesperson for the case, provided a statement to the senate Judiciary Committee regarding the copyright infringement.[1] The suit consisted of three violations, Napster was accused of copyright infringement, unlawful use of digital audio interface , and violation of the Racketeer Influence and Corrupt Organizations Act. Metallica argued that Napster was enabling users to exchange copyrighted MP3 files. By allowing their music to be shared, users were not paying sufficient homage to their grueling artistry.[2] Metallica sought at least $10 million dollars in damages, which is based upon $100,000 per song illegally downloaded.[3] Metallica also demanded that all of their songs not be available for sharing and the users responsible for sharing their music be banned from the service. This lead to over 300,000 users being banned from the service, 30,000 of which claimed they never shared any Metallica songs.[4] This suit also named several universities to be held accountable for allowing students to illegally download music on their networks. These universities included University of Southern California, Yale University, and Indiana University.[5] The court ruled in favor of Metallica and Napster was forced to block several songs from being downloaded and users banned. This court ruling led to Dr. Dre joining the suit and several other lawsuits by music artists, record companies, and the RIAA.
References
[edit]- ^ http://web.archive.org/web/20071129061341/http://judiciary.senate.gov/testimony.cfm?id=195&wit_id=252
- ^ Marshall L. (2002, April 5) Metallica and Morality: The Rhetorical Battleground of the Napster Wars. Pg. 8
- ^ http://news.cnet.com/2100-1023-239263.html
- ^ http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/47976/napster_timeline/
- ^ http://news.cnet.com/2100-1023-239263.html
Online mentor
[edit]Hi there. I have signed up to be "online mentor", to you and to Silversj4467 (talk · contribs).
I did so at the request of Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation .
So...I'd like to know if I can help you, in any way.
Please leave me a note on my talk page.
I look forward to hearing from you. Cheers, Chzz ► 09:14, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
- I guess you spoke w/ Silversj4467 (talk · contribs) - great; xe left a message on my talk page, see User_talk:Chzz#James_Silvers. And so, feel free to edit User:Silversj4467/sausages.
- Yes, that is a stupid name for the page, but meh; welcome to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 23:54, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for responding! Nice to "meet" you, as it were.
- So...I'm not entirely clear on what you both want to do on Wikipedia - but, whatever it is...if you need help, just ask. Any time.
- For now...well, I firmly believe the best way to learn Wikipedia is by doing stuff. So, if you like, maybe look at this - which is, new pages that need some tidying up. Click 'edit' on any of 'em, and help out :-)
- That's just an example; believe me, there's always plenty to do. Other interesting stuff might be the newly created pages, or the village pump or...for lighter relief, Wikipedia:List of unusual articles.
- Wikipedia is massive - and thus, whilst it is supposed to be easy, it can be daunting. A steep learning curve. I hope to get you over it; just don't get too addicted :-) Chzz ► 00:35, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Re. User:Silversj4467/sausages - nice to see you're working on the article. If there's anything I can do to help, please let me know. Cheers, Chzz ► 22:20, 23 April 2011 (UTC)
Progress update
[edit]Hi, I'm just checking in, to see how you are getting along - please let me know. Of course, if there's anything I can do to help, give me a shout too. Cheers, Chzz ► 09:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Metallica v. Napster, Inc.
[edit]On 15 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Metallica v. Napster, Inc., which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Metallica v. Napster, Inc. was the first case that involved an artist suing a P2P software company? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 12:03, 15 May 2011 (UTC)